Forecasting Stability or Retreat in Emerging Democratic Regimes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Drawing on the literatures on elite transitions, factionalism and the new institutionalism, this paper hypothesizes that the stability of partially democratic and emerging democratic regimes is dependent on the willingness of elites to make credible commitments to cooperate and comply with democratic rules. That willingness (or lack thereof) can be signaled by the presence of cooperative or conflict-precipitating events and actions in the periods around elections. We identify and analyze a variety of intra-elite interactions and demonstrate that conflict-precipitating events significantly increase the odds of a democratic retreat in the months before or just after an election, while cooperative events can balance them and prevent retreat. Using event data collected from 40 lowand middle-income countries for two-year periods around national elections between 1991 and 2007 we show that the imbalance of conflict-precipitating over cooperative events is far greater in cases of retreat from democracy. Furthermore, international intervention and pressure had a negative relationship with democratic stability. A logistic regression model accurately identified democratic retreat in 79 percent of the cases examined. Factor analysis revealed several common patterns of intra-elite conflict that can lead to democratic retreat, or conversely, patterns of cooperative events that bolster democratic consolidation. Finally, the data strongly argues for a model of democratic development that depends on open-ended elite maneuvering and the emergence of elite agreements, rather than a model where strong prior institutional constraints determine elite actions.
منابع مشابه
Non-Taxation and Representation: Distribution, Redistribution, and Political Stability in the Modern World
Might foreign aid and oil revenues have similar effects on political regimes? Drawing upon formal modeling, cross-national statistical analysis, and in-depth case studies, my dissertation explores the relationship between patterns of government revenue generation and political regime stability. Existing research has devoted surprisingly limited attention to variations in the sources of governme...
متن کاملTypes and Indices of Democratic Regimes
Today democracy is seen as the only legitimate form of government almost all over the world. That it can be institutionalized differently leads to the question which kind of democracy might be better or worse. This question can be answered normatively, but also on the basis of different performances that can be determined empirically. The latter requires an adequate theoretical conceptualizatio...
متن کاملHistorical Timing and Party Building in “ Third Wave ” Democracies : The Latin American Experience
IntRoDuCtIon theorists of democracy routinely assert that party systems perform a series of vital functions for representative governance. If that is the case, " third wave " democracies—those born through the spread of representative institutions to new countries and regions since the mid-1970s (Huntington 1991)—would appear to be in serious trouble, as many are characterized by weak, volatile...
متن کاملThe Centre for Democratic Institutions Review of the CDI Pacific Parliamentary Retreat Program
متن کامل
ستیز دولت و بنیادگرایی اسلامی و تاثیر آن بر توسعه در خاورمیانه
Today, in most theories related to development, democratic regimes are introduced as one of the tools and indices of development. In fact, theoretically and practically, democratic regimes provide the most important and the most appropriate ground for the development, while other regimes can never play such a role. Having a look at ruling political regimes in the Middle East, it appears that, e...
متن کامل